Hallucination
In short
A hallucination is when an AI tool confidently states something false or made up, such as a fake fact, quote or source. It happens because chatbots predict likely-sounding text rather than look facts up.
- Also called
- AI hallucination, Confabulation, Fabrication
- Topic
- The basics
- Level
- Beginner
- First described
- The term was used in machine translation and image research for years before chatbots made it mainstream. Ji and colleagues' 2023 survey is the standard reference3.
Chatbots write by predicting the next most likely word. Most of the time that produces true sentences, because true sentences are common in their training data. But a fluent, plausible answer is not the same as a checked one.
The US standards body NIST prefers the word "confabulation" for this, describing it as AI systems that "confidently present erroneous or false content", and notes it is "colloquially" called hallucination1. NIST also points out that some people object to "hallucination" because it makes software sound human1.
A 2025 OpenAI paper argues one cause is how models are trained and tested: scoring rewards a confident guess over saying "I don't know"2. A widely cited survey of the problem groups hallucinations into ones that contradict the source given and ones that add things the source never said3.
Tools that search the web or quote documents (see retrieval-augmented generation) make hallucinations less likely, but do not remove them.
Example
In 2025 the High Court in London warned lawyers after fictitious case citations, which the court found had likely been produced with AI, were put before it. The judgment states that freely available AI tools "are not capable of conducting reliable legal research"4.
Why it matters
It is the main reason not to trust an AI answer on anything important without checking. A made-up source looks exactly like a real one.
Questions people ask
Why do AI chatbots make things up?
They generate text by predicting likely words, not by looking up facts. A 2025 OpenAI paper adds that training and testing reward confident guessing over admitting uncertainty2.
Can you stop an AI from hallucinating?
Not completely. Asking it to cite sources, giving it the documents to work from, and using tools that search the web all reduce the risk. Checking important claims yourself is still necessary.
Is hallucination the same as lying?
No. Lying means knowingly saying something false. A model has no intent; it produces a confident answer that happens to be wrong. That is why NIST prefers the word confabulation1.
Related terms
Tools that use it
- ChatGPTOpenAI's general chatbot, the most used AI app in the UK and worldwide.
- ClaudeAnthropic's chatbot, strong on writing and on pointing out holes in an argument, with a tight free allowance.
- PerplexityAn AI search engine that answers in plain sentences and numbers every source it used.
Sources
- NIST AI 600-1 (July 2024), AI Risk Management Framework: Generative AI Profile, section 2.2
- Kalai, Nachum, Vempala and Zhang (2025), Why Language Models Hallucinate, arXiv:2509.04664
- Ji et al. (2023), Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generation, ACM Computing Surveys
- R (Ayinde) v London Borough of Haringey [2025] EWHC 1383 (Admin), para 6